River Point Tower vs BMO Tower

River Point Tower
BMO Tower

Comparing the River Point Tower and the BMO Tower is interesting because they both stand in Chicago, IL, and were completed within 4 years of each other, but they were designed by different architects.

This offers a unique glimpse at how rival designers approached projects in the same city during the same era.

Height
223m
Floors
52

Height & Size

Height
222m
Floors
51

The River Point Tower is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 732ft (223m) with 52 floors above ground, while the BMO Tower reaches 728ft (222m) with 51 floors above ground.

River Point Tower also offers more total built-up area, a total fo 1,799,993 sqf (167,225m2), which is about 59,998 sqf (5,574m2) more than what the BMO Tower offers.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
Contemporary

Architectural Style

Style
Contemporary

Both the River Point Tower and the BMO Tower were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Contemporary style.

At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So both Pickard Chilton and Goettsch Partners followed what was in many ways expected of them, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms, rather than breaking with convention.

Main use
Commercial

Uses

Main use
Commercial

Both the River Point Tower and the BMO Tower were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

Both towers provide significant parking capacity, with River Point Tower offering 160 spaces and the BMO Tower offering 324.

Structure
Framed Tube In Tube
Facade
Curtain Wall

Structure & Facade

Structure
Frame
Facade
Curtain Wall

The two towers rely on different structural systems, reflecting distinct engineering strategies.

The River Point Tower uses a Framed Tube In Tube structural system, which combines a strong central core with a perimeter tube of columns, while the BMO Tower uses a Frame system, that relies on a regular grid of columns and beams to sustain its weight.

Yet, when it comes to their facade, they both employed the same solution, a Curtain Wall facade.

A curtain wall is a non-load-bearing facade hung from the structural frame. It is anchored to floor slabs and transfers only its own weight and wind loads, allowing for sleek, glassy exteriors.

River Point Tower BMO Tower
Pickard Chilton Architect Goettsch Partners
2008 Design Ended 2018
2013 Construction Started 2019
2017 Year Completed 2021
Contemporary Architectural Style Contemporary
Commercial Current Use Commercial
52 Floors Above Ground 51
1 Floors Below Ground 2
223 m Height (m) 222 m
167225 Built-up Area (m²) 161651
111,500 m² Usable Area (m²) 140,000 m²
Framed Tube In Tube Structure Type Frame
Steel Vertical Structure Material Concrete And Steel
Poured Concrete Over Metal Decking Horizontal Structure Material Poured Concrete Over Metal Decking
No Facade Structural? No
Glass Main Facade Material Glass, Steel
Lend Lease Main Contractor Clark Construction
Hines Developer Riverside Investment & Development
OJB Landscape Architecture Landscape Architect Wolff Landscape Architecture
Alvine Engineering MEP Engineer Environmental Systems Design, Inc.
Magnusson Klemencic Associates Structural Engineer Magnusson Klemencic Associates
IL State IL
Chicago City Chicago
444 West Lake Street Address 320 South Canal Street