Williams Tower vs One International Place Building

Williams Tower
One International Place Building

Comparing the Williams Tower and the One International Place Building is an interesting exercise, because even though they are located in different cities (Houston, TX and Boston, MA), both were designed by Johnson/Burgee Architects and finished within within 4 years of each other. This gives us the chance to see how the same architect's ideas were expressed in different urban contexts almost simultaneously.

Height
275m
Floors
64

Height & Size

Height
183m
Floors
46

The Williams Tower is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 902ft (275m) with 64 floors above ground, while the One International Place Building reaches 600ft (183m) with 46 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
Postmodernism

Architectural Style

Style
Postmodernism

Both the Williams Tower and the One International Place Building were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Postmodernism style.

At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So Johnson/Burgee Architects followed what was in many ways expected at the time, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms rather, than breaking with convention.

Main use
Commercial

Uses

Main use
Commercial

Both the Williams Tower and the One International Place Building were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

Both towers provide significant parking capacity, with Williams Tower offering 3280 spaces and the One International Place Building offering 400.

Structure
Frame
Facade
Curtain Wall

Structure & Facade

Structure
Frame
Facade
Window Wall

Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The Williams Tower uses a Curtain Wall facade, while the One International Place Building uses a Window Wall facade.

A Curtain Wall facade like the one seen in the Williams Tower uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure, while a window-wall facade like the one seen in the One International Place Building uses panels fitted between floor slabs, leaving slab edges visible.

Williams Tower One International Place Building
Johnson/Burgee Architects Architect Johnson/Burgee Architects
1983 Year Completed 1987
Postmodernism Architectural Style Postmodernism
Commercial Current Use Commercial
64 Floors Above Ground 46
275 m Height (m) 183 m
137,718 m² Usable Area (m²) 95,226 m²
49 Number of Elevators 6
Frame Structure Type Frame
Steel Vertical Structure Material Steel
Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Reinforced Concrete
No Facade Structural? Yes
Glass, Steel Main Facade Material Glass, Granite
Gerald D Hines Interests Developer The Chiofaro Company
CBM Engineers Inc. Structural Engineer McNamara . Salvia
TX State MA
Houston City Boston
2800 Post Oak Boulevard Address 100 Oliver Street