University Club Tower vs Random House Tower

University Club Tower
Random House Tower

Comparing the University Club Tower and the Random House Tower is an interesting exercise, because even though they are located in different cities (Milwaukee, WI and New York, NY), both were designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and finished within within 4 years of each other. This gives us the chance to see how the same architect's ideas were expressed in different urban contexts almost simultaneously.

Height
136m
Floors
34

Height & Size

Height
208m
Floors
52

The Random House Tower is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 682ft (208m) with 52 floors above ground, while the University Club Tower reaches 446ft (136m) with 34 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
Contemporary

Architectural Style

Style
Contemporary

Both the University Club Tower and the Random House Tower were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Contemporary style.

At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So Skidmore, Owings & Merrill followed what was in many ways expected at the time, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms rather, than breaking with convention.

Main use
Residential

Uses

Main use
Mixed

The Random House Tower follows a mixed-use model, combining commercial and residential. In contrast, the University Club Tower has remained primarily residential.

In terms of capacity, the University Club Tower offers 53 apartments, while the Random House Tower provides 101 units.

Both towers provide significant parking capacity, with University Club Tower offering 106 spaces and the Random House Tower offering 150.

Structure
Frame
Facade
Modular

Structure & Facade

Structure
Frame
Facade
Curtain Wall

Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The University Club Tower uses a Modular facade, while the Random House Tower uses a Curtain Wall facade.

A Modular facade like the one seen in the University Club Tower employs prefabricated panels, often mixing solid surfaces with smaller windows, while a curtain-wall facade like the one seen in the Random House Tower uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure.

University Club Tower Random House Tower
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Architect Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
2004 Construction Started 2000
2007 Year Completed 2003
Contemporary Architectural Style Contemporary
Residential Current Use Mixed
34 Floors Above Ground 52
1 Floors Below Ground 2
115 Last Floor Height 193
136 m Height (m) 208 m
53 Residential Units 101
Frame Structure Type Frame
Reinforced Concrete Vertical Structure Material Steel And Reinforced Concrete
Reinforced Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Reinforced Concrete
Yes Facade Structural? No
Concrete, Glass Main Facade Material Glass, Steel, Aluminum
J.H.Findorff & Sons Main Contractor Plaza Construction Corporation
Mandel Group Developer Steve Ross
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Structural Engineer Thornton Tomasetti
WI State NY
Milwaukee City New York
825 N Prospect Ave Address 1739 Broadway