Heritage at Millennium Park vs BMO Tower


Comparing the Heritage at Millennium Park and the BMO Tower is interesting because they both rise in Chicago, IL, yet they were conceived by two different design teams, Solomon Cordwell Buenz and Goettsch Partners , and were completed at different points in time. They were finished more than a decade apart.
This contrast within the same city allows us to see how different creative minds interpreted the evolving needs of Chicago across time.
Let's take a closer look!
Height & Size
These two towers present an interesting contrast in their proportions. The BMO Tower rises higher at 728ft (222m), while the Heritage at Millennium Park reaches 631ft (192.4m). However, the Heritage at Millennium Park accommodates more floors with 57 levels above ground, compared to 51 floors in the BMO Tower.
This suggests different approaches to interior space design. The BMO Tower has an average floor-to-floor height of approximately 4.4m, while the Heritage at Millennium Park has more compact floors averaging around 3.4m each. The taller building's more generous floor heights might indicate grander interior spaces, higher ceilings, or different programmatic requirements.
These different proportions likely reflect the specific needs each building was designed to serve, whether driven by zoning regulations, client requirements, or the intended use of the spaces within. The contrast shows how architects can achieve different spatial experiences even when working with similar overall building scales.
Architectural Style
Both the Heritage at Millennium Park and the BMO Tower were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Contemporary style.
At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So both Solomon Cordwell Buenz and Goettsch Partners followed what was in many ways expected of them, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms, rather than breaking with convention.
Uses
The Heritage at Millennium Park follows a mixed-use model, combining residential and retail. In contrast, the BMO Tower has remained primarily commercial.
The Heritage at Millennium Park offers 359 residential units.
The BMO Tower also provides 324 parking spaces.
Structure & Facade
Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.
A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.
However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The Heritage at Millennium Park uses a Modular facade, while the BMO Tower uses a Curtain Wall facade.
A Modular facade like the one seen in the Heritage at Millennium Park employs prefabricated panels, often mixing solid surfaces with smaller windows, while a curtain-wall facade like the one seen in the BMO Tower uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure.
Heritage at Millennium Park | BMO Tower | |
---|---|---|
Solomon Cordwell Buenz | Architect | Goettsch Partners |
2002 | Construction Started | 2019 |
2005 | Year Completed | 2021 |
Contemporary | Architectural Style | Contemporary |
Mixed | Current Use | Commercial |
57 | Floors Above Ground | 51 |
192.4 m | Height (m) | 222 m |
1 | Built-up Area (m²) | 161651 |
103,938 m² | Usable Area (m²) | 140,000 m² |
Frame | Structure Type | Frame |
Reinforced Concrete | Vertical Structure Material | Concrete And Steel |
Reinforced Concrete | Horizontal Structure Material | Poured Concrete Over Metal Decking |
No | Facade Structural? | No |
Glass,steel | Main Facade Material | Glass, Steel |
Walsh Construction Company | Main Contractor | Clark Construction |
Mesa Development, LLC | Developer | Riverside Investment & Development |
Environmental Systems Design, Inc. | MEP Engineer | Environmental Systems Design, Inc. |
IL | State | IL |
Chicago | City | Chicago |
130 N Garland Court | Address | 320 South Canal Street |