Pittsfield Building vs Civic Opera House

Comparing the Pittsfield Building and the Civic Opera House is especially interesting because they share much in common. Both rise in Chicago, IL both were designed by Graham, Anderson, Probst & White, and they were completed within 2 years of each other.

This overlap gives us a unique opportunity to understand how Graham, Anderson, Probst & White approached different commissions in the same urban context and historical context during a short period.

The Civic Opera House is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 554ft (169m) with 45 floors above ground, while the Pittsfield Building reaches 551ft (168m) with 38 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

The Pittsfield Building was designed in the Neogothic style, while the Civic Opera House reflects the principles of Art Deco.

The Pittsfield Building represents a late expression of the Neogothic, a style already in decline in 1927 when it was completed. By contrast, the Civic Opera House followed the then mainstream Art Deco, embodying the dominant architectural direction of its time.

Both the Pittsfield Building and the Civic Opera House are primarily commercial towers, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

Originally, the Pittsfield Building was designed for medical, but over time it was converted to commercial. The Civic Opera House by contrast has maintained its original role.

Both the Pittsfield Building and the Civic Opera House rely on a Frame structural system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

They also employ the same type of facade, a Masonry facade.

A masonry facade gives the building a heavier, more traditional appearance. It often conceals a frame structure behind it, creating the look of solid walls without carrying the main loads.