Chicago Temple Building vs Pittsfield Building

Comparing the Chicago Temple Building and the Pittsfield Building is interesting because they both stand in Chicago, IL, and were completed within 3 years of each other, but they were designed by different architects.

This offers a unique glimpse at how rival designers approached projects in the same city during the same era.

These two towers present an interesting contrast in their proportions. The Chicago Temple Building rises higher at 568ft (173m), while the Pittsfield Building reaches 551ft (168m). However, the Pittsfield Building accommodates more floors with 38 levels above ground, compared to 23 floors in the Chicago Temple Building.

This suggests different approaches to interior space design. The Chicago Temple Building has an average floor-to-floor height of approximately 7.5m, while the Pittsfield Building has more compact floors averaging around 4.4m each. The taller building's more generous floor heights might indicate grander interior spaces, higher ceilings, or different programmatic requirements.

These different proportions likely reflect the specific needs each building was designed to serve, whether driven by zoning regulations, client requirements, or the intended use of the spaces within. The contrast shows how architects can achieve different spatial experiences even when working with similar overall building scales.

Both the Chicago Temple Building and the Pittsfield Building were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Neogothic style.

Both buildings were completed when the Neogothic style was already past its peak. This makes them feel like late echoes of the movement, more reflective of continuity or nostalgia than of cutting-edge design at the time.

The Chicago Temple Building is primarily religious, while the Pittsfield Building is primarily commercial.

Originally, the Pittsfield Building was designed for medical, but over time it was converted to commercial. The Chicago Temple Building by contrast has maintained its original role.

Both the Chicago Temple Building and the Pittsfield Building rely on a Frame structural system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

They also employ the same type of facade, a Masonry facade.

A masonry facade gives the building a heavier, more traditional appearance. It often conceals a frame structure behind it, creating the look of solid walls without carrying the main loads.