Palmolive Building vs The Bell Building

Palmolive Building
The Bell Building

Comparing the Palmolive Building and the The Bell Building is particularly interesting because they share the same skyline in Chicago, IL, and were both designed by Holabird & Root. However, they were completed more than 37 years apart.

This offers a unique perspective on how the architect's style and the city's architecture evolved over time.

Height
172m
Floors
37

Height & Size

Height
130m
Floors
31

The Palmolive Building is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 564ft (172m) with 37 floors above ground, while the The Bell Building reaches 427ft (130m) with 31 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
Art Deco

Architectural Style

Style
Modern

The Palmolive Building was designed in the Art Deco style, while the The Bell Building reflects the principles of Modern.

The The Bell Building represents a late expression of the Modern, a style already in decline in 1966 when it was completed. By contrast, the Palmolive Building followed the then mainstream Art Deco, embodying the dominant architectural direction of its time.

With 37 years between them, the comparison also reflects how quickly architectural priorities can shift from one dominant language to another.

Main use
Residential

Uses

Main use

The Palmolive Building is primarily residential, while the The Bell Building is primarily .

However, both of them have shifted purpose since their completion. The Palmolive Building evolved from commercial to residential, while the The Bell Building moved from commercial to .

The Palmolive Building offers 102 residential units.

Structure
Frame
Facade
Masonry

Structure & Facade

Structure
Framed Tube In Tube
Facade
Curtain Wall

The two buildings opted for different structural and facade solutions.

The Palmolive Building uses a Frame system, which relies on a regular grid of columns and beams to sustain its weight, while the The Bell Building uses a Framed Tube In Tube system, that combines a strong central core with a perimeter tube of columns.

And when it came to the facade, the Masonry went with a Masonry facade, which features a heavy masonry skin that gives it a more clasical look, while the The Bell Building opted for a Curtain Wall facade, that uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure.

Palmolive Building The Bell Building
Holabird & Root Architect Holabird & Root
1927 Construction Started 1963
1929 Year Completed 1966
Art Deco Architectural Style Modern
Commercial Original Use Commercial
37 Floors Above Ground 31
172 m Height (m) 130 m
Frame Structure Type Framed Tube In Tube
Steel Vertical Structure Material Steel
Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Reinforced Concrete
No Facade Structural? Yes
Verne O. McClurg Structural Engineer Frank Henderson
IL State IL
Chicago City Chicago
919 North Michigan Avenue For The Commercial Spaces, And 159 East Walton Place For The Residences Address 225 W. Randolph St