Mid-Continental Plaza vs University Apartments


Comparing the Mid-Continental Plaza and the University Apartments is interesting because they both rise in Chicago, IL, yet they were conceived by two different design teams, Shaw and Associates and I. M. Pei, and were completed at different points in time. They were finished more than a decade apart.
This contrast within the same city allows us to see how different creative minds interpreted the evolving needs of Chicago across time.
Let's take a closer look!
Height & Size
The Mid-Continental Plaza is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 584ft (178m) with 49 floors above ground, while the University Apartments reaches 308ft (94m) with 10 floors above ground.
Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.
Architectural Style
Both the Mid-Continental Plaza and the University Apartments were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the International Style style.
The Mid-Continental Plaza was designed at a moment when the International Style style was already in decline, making it more of a lingering expression of the movement. In contrast, the University Apartments style was already in decline, making it more of a lingering expression of the movement. In contrast, the University Apartments was built when the style still carried greater cultural weight.
Uses
The Mid-Continental Plaza is primarily commercial, while the University Apartments is primarily residential.
In terms of capacity, the Mid-Continental Plaza offers 215 apartments, while the University Apartments provides 540 units.
The University Apartments also provides 220 parking spaces.
Structure & Facade
Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.
A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.
However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The Mid-Continental Plaza uses a Curtain Wall facade, while the University Apartments uses a Window Wall facade.
A Curtain Wall facade like the one seen in the Mid-Continental Plaza uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure, while a window-wall facade like the one seen in the University Apartments uses panels fitted between floor slabs, leaving slab edges visible.
Mid-Continental Plaza | University Apartments | |
---|---|---|
Shaw and Associates | Architect | I. M. Pei |
1969 | Construction Started | 1959 |
1972 | Year Completed | 1961 |
International Style | Architectural Style | International Style |
Commercial | Current Use | Residential |
49 | Floors Above Ground | 10 |
2 | Floors Below Ground | 1 |
178 m | Height (m) | 94 m |
215 | Residential Units | 540 |
Frame | Structure Type | Frame |
Concrete | Vertical Structure Material | Concrete |
Concrete | Horizontal Structure Material | Concrete |
No | Facade Structural? | Yes |
Glass, Steel | Main Facade Material | Glass, Concrete |
William Schmidt & Associates | Structural Engineer | August Komendant |
IL | State | IL |
Chicago | City | Chicago |
55 East Monroe Street | Address | 1400 1451 E.55th Street |