Koppers Tower vs Civic Opera House

Comparing the Koppers Tower and the Civic Opera House is an interesting exercise, because even though they are located in different cities (Pittsburgh, PA and Chicago, IL), both were designed by Graham, Anderson, Probst & White and finished within in the same year. This gives us the chance to see how the same architect's ideas were expressed in different urban contexts almost simultaneously.

The Civic Opera House is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 554ft (169m) with 45 floors above ground, while the Koppers Tower reaches 476ft (145m) with 34 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Both the Koppers Tower and the Civic Opera House were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Art Deco style.

At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So Graham, Anderson, Probst & White followed what was in many ways expected at the time, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms rather, than breaking with convention.

Both the Koppers Tower and the Civic Opera House were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

Both the Koppers Tower and the Civic Opera House rely on a Frame structural system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

They also employ the same type of facade, a Masonry facade.

A masonry facade gives the building a heavier, more traditional appearance. It often conceals a frame structure behind it, creating the look of solid walls without carrying the main loads.