John Hancock Tower vs 71 South Wacker Building

John Hancock Tower
71 South Wacker Building

Comparing the John Hancock Tower and the 71 South Wacker Building is compelling because they were both designed by Pei Cobb Freed & Partners, yet they stand in different cities (Boston, MA and Chicago, IL), and were completed over two decades apart.

What this will allow us to see, is how the same firm's approach adapted to different places in different periods of time.

Height
241m
Floors
60

Height & Size

Height
207.1m
Floors
48

The John Hancock Tower is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 791ft (241m) with 60 floors above ground, while the 71 South Wacker Building reaches 679ft (207.1m) with 48 floors above ground.

John Hancock Tower also offers more total built-up area, a total fo 2,809,378 sqf (261,000m2), which is about 1,044,378 sqf (97,026m2) more than what the 71 South Wacker Building offers.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
International Style

Architectural Style

Style
Contemporary

The John Hancock Tower was designed in the International Style style, while the 71 South Wacker Building reflects the principles of Contemporary.

The John Hancock Tower represents a late expression of the International Style, a style already in decline in 1976 when it was completed. By contrast, the 71 South Wacker Building followed the then mainstream Contemporary, embodying the dominant architectural direction of its time.

With 29 years between them, the comparison also reflects how quickly architectural priorities can shift from one dominant language to another.

Main use
Commercial

Uses

Main use
Commercial

Both the John Hancock Tower and the 71 South Wacker Building were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

The 71 South Wacker Building also provides 163 parking spaces.

Structure
Frame
Facade
Curtain Wall

Structure & Facade

Structure
Framed Tube In Tube
Facade
Curtain Wall

The two towers rely on different structural systems, reflecting distinct engineering strategies.

The John Hancock Tower uses a Frame structural system, which relies on a regular grid of columns and beams to sustain its weight, while the 71 South Wacker Building uses a Framed Tube In Tube system, that combines a strong central core with a perimeter tube of columns.

Yet, when it comes to their facade, they both employed the same solution, a Curtain Wall facade.

A curtain wall is a non-load-bearing facade hung from the structural frame. It is anchored to floor slabs and transfers only its own weight and wind loads, allowing for sleek, glassy exteriors.

John Hancock Tower 71 South Wacker Building
Pei Cobb Freed & Partners Architect Pei Cobb Freed & Partners
1968 Construction Started 2002
1976 Year Completed 2005
International Style Architectural Style Contemporary
Commercial Current Use Commercial
60 Floors Above Ground 48
2 Floors Below Ground 2
241 m Height (m) 207.1 m
261000 Built-up Area (m²) 163974
21 Number of Elevators 28
Frame Structure Type Framed Tube In Tube
Steel Vertical Structure Material Steel
Reinforced Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Concrete
No Facade Structural? No
Glass Main Facade Material Glass, Stainless Steel
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Developer Higgins Development Partners, LLC
Cosentini Associates MEP Engineer Environmental System Design, Inc
James Rudrman Structural Engineer Halvorson And Partners
MA State IL
Boston City Chicago
200 Clarendon Street Address 71 South Wacker Drive