John Hancock Center vs Random House Tower

John Hancock Center
Random House Tower

Comparing the John Hancock Center and the Random House Tower is compelling because they were both designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, yet they stand in different cities (Chicago, IL and New York, NY), and were completed over two decades apart.

What this will allow us to see, is how the same firm's approach adapted to different places in different periods of time.

Height
344m
Floors
100

Height & Size

Height
208m
Floors
52

The John Hancock Center is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 1129ft (344m) with 100 floors above ground, while the Random House Tower reaches 682ft (208m) with 52 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
International Style

Architectural Style

Style
Contemporary

The John Hancock Center was designed in the International Style style, while the Random House Tower reflects the principles of Contemporary.

At the time of their completion, both styles were well established. This makes the comparison especially interesting, because both buildings represent a dominant aesthetic at a particular point in time.

Built 34 years apart (1969 vs 2003), these two buildings are a perfect example of how different architectural styles have shaped the architectural landscape of our cities over time.

Main use

Uses

Main use
Mixed

The Random House Tower follows a mixed-use model, combining commercial and residential. In contrast, the John Hancock Center has remained primarily .

In terms of capacity, the John Hancock Center offers 703 apartments, while the Random House Tower provides 101 units.

Both towers provide significant parking capacity, with John Hancock Center offering 710 spaces and the Random House Tower offering 150.

Structure
Trussed Tube In Tube
Facade
Window Wall

Structure & Facade

Structure
Frame
Facade
Curtain Wall

The two buildings opted for different structural and facade solutions.

The John Hancock Center uses a Trussed Tube In Tube system, which combines a central core with a perimeter tube reinforced by diagonal bracing, while the Random House Tower uses a Frame system, that relies on a regular grid of columns and beams to sustain its weight.

And when it came to the facade, the Window Wall went with a Window Wall facade, which uses panels fitted between floor slabs, leaving slab edges visible, while the Random House Tower opted for a Curtain Wall facade, that uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure.

John Hancock Center Random House Tower
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Architect Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
1965 Construction Started 2000
1969 Year Completed 2003
International Style Architectural Style Contemporary
100 Floors Above Ground 52
1 Floors Below Ground 2
321 Last Floor Height 193
344 m Height (m) 208 m
703 Residential Units 101
Trussed Tube In Tube Structure Type Frame
Steel Vertical Structure Material Steel And Reinforced Concrete
Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Reinforced Concrete
Yes Facade Structural? No
Steel, Glass Main Facade Material Glass, Steel, Aluminum
Tishman Construction Co Main Contractor Plaza Construction Corporation
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Developer Steve Ross
Fazlur Rahman Khan, And Srinivasa Iyengar Structural Engineer Thornton Tomasetti
IL State NY
Chicago City New York
875 North Michigan Avenue Address 1739 Broadway