Equitable Building vs 383 Madison Avenue Building

Equitable Building
383 Madison Avenue Building

Comparing the Equitable Building and the 383 Madison Avenue Building is compelling because they were both designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, yet they stand in different cities (Chicago, IL and New York, NY), and were completed over two decades apart.

What this will allow us to see, is how the same firm's approach adapted to different places in different periods of time.

Height
139m
Floors
35

Height & Size

Height
230m
Floors
47

The 383 Madison Avenue Building is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 755ft (230m) with 47 floors above ground, while the Equitable Building reaches 456ft (139m) with 35 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Style
International Style

Architectural Style

Style
Contemporary

The Equitable Building was designed in the International Style style, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building reflects the principles of Contemporary.

At the time of their completion, both styles were well established. This makes the comparison especially interesting, because both buildings represent a dominant aesthetic at a particular point in time.

Built 36 years apart (1965 vs 2001), these two buildings are a perfect example of how different architectural styles have shaped the architectural landscape of our cities over time.

Main use
Commercial

Uses

Main use
Commercial

Both the Equitable Building and the 383 Madison Avenue Building were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

Structure
Framed Tube In Tube
Facade
Curtain Wall

Structure & Facade

Structure
Frame
Facade
Modular

The two buildings opted for different structural and facade solutions.

The Equitable Building uses a Framed Tube In Tube system, which combines a strong central core with a perimeter tube of columns, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building uses a Frame system, that relies on a regular grid of columns and beams to sustain its weight.

And when it came to the facade, the Curtain Wall went with a Curtain Wall facade, which uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building opted for a Modular facade, that employs prefabricated panels, often mixing solid surfaces with smaller windows.

Equitable Building 383 Madison Avenue Building
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Architect Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
1963 Construction Started 1999
1965 Year Completed 2001
International Style Architectural Style Contemporary
Commercial Current Use Commercial
35 Floors Above Ground 47
139 m Height (m) 230 m
74,000 m² Usable Area (m²) 86,890 m²
Framed Tube In Tube Structure Type Frame
Steel Vertical Structure Material Steel
Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Poured Concrete Over Metal Decking
Yes Facade Structural? No
Aluminum, Glass Main Facade Material Granite, Glass
Equitable Insurance Company Developer Gerald D Hines Interests
IL State NY
Chicago City New York
401 North Michigan Avenue Address 383 Madison Avenue