Accenture Tower vs North Harbor Tower


Comparing the Accenture Tower and the North Harbor Tower is interesting because they both stand in Chicago, IL, and were completed just one year apart, but they were designed by different architects.
This offers a unique glimpse at how rival designers approached projects in the same city during the same era.
Height & Size
These two towers present an interesting contrast in their proportions. The Accenture Tower rises higher at 587ft (179m), while the North Harbor Tower reaches 554ft (169m). However, the North Harbor Tower accommodates more floors with 55 levels above ground, compared to 42 floors in the Accenture Tower.
This suggests different approaches to interior space design. The Accenture Tower has an average floor-to-floor height of approximately 4.3m, while the North Harbor Tower has more compact floors averaging around 3.1m each. The taller building's more generous floor heights might indicate grander interior spaces, higher ceilings, or different programmatic requirements.
These different proportions likely reflect the specific needs each building was designed to serve, whether driven by zoning regulations, client requirements, or the intended use of the spaces within. The contrast shows how architects can achieve different spatial experiences even when working with similar overall building scales.
Architectural Style
Both the Accenture Tower and the North Harbor Tower were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Postmodernism style.
At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So both Murphy/Jahn Architects and Fujikawa Johnson & Associates followed what was in many ways expected of them, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms, rather than breaking with convention.
Uses
The Accenture Tower is primarily commercial, while the North Harbor Tower is primarily residential.
The North Harbor Tower offers 600 residential units.
The North Harbor Tower also provides 404 parking spaces.
Structure & Facade
Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.
A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.
However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The Accenture Tower uses a Curtain Wall facade, while the North Harbor Tower uses a Window Wall facade.
A Curtain Wall facade like the one seen in the Accenture Tower uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure, while a window-wall facade like the one seen in the North Harbor Tower uses panels fitted between floor slabs, leaving slab edges visible.
Accenture Tower | North Harbor Tower | |
---|---|---|
Murphy/Jahn Architects | Architect | Fujikawa Johnson & Associates |
1987 | Year Completed | 1988 |
Postmodernism | Architectural Style | Postmodernism |
Commercial | Current Use | Residential |
42 | Floors Above Ground | 55 |
179 m | Height (m) | 169 m |
Frame | Structure Type | Frame |
Steel | Vertical Structure Material | Concrete |
Concrete And Steel | Horizontal Structure Material | Concrete |
No | Facade Structural? | Yes |
Aluminum, Glass, Steel | Main Facade Material | Glass, Concrete |
Cohen Barreto Marchertas | Structural Engineer | Alfred Benesch & Company |
IL | State | IL |
Chicago | City | Chicago |
500 West Madison Street | Address | 175 North Harbor Drive |