425 Market Street Building vs 383 Madison Avenue Building

Comparing the 425 Market Street Building and the 383 Madison Avenue Building is compelling because they were both designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill, yet they stand in different cities (San Francisco, CA and New York, NY), and were completed over two decades apart.

What this will allow us to see, is how the same firm's approach adapted to different places in different periods of time.

The 383 Madison Avenue Building is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 755ft (230m) with 47 floors above ground, while the 425 Market Street Building reaches 525ft (160m) with 38 floors above ground.

383 Madison Avenue Building also offers more total built-up area, a total fo 1,184,029 sqf (110,000m²), which is about 84,034 sqf (7,807m²) more than what the 425 Market Street Building offers.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

The 425 Market Street Building was designed in the International Style style, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building reflects the principles of Contemporary.

The 425 Market Street Building represents a late expression of the International Style, a style already in decline in 1973 when it was completed. By contrast, the 383 Madison Avenue Building followed the then mainstream Contemporary, embodying the dominant architectural direction of its time.

With 28 years between them, the comparison also reflects how quickly architectural priorities can shift from one dominant language to another.

Both the 425 Market Street Building and the 383 Madison Avenue Building were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

The 425 Market Street Building also provides 139 parking spaces.

Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The 425 Market Street Building uses a Window Wall facade, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building uses a Modular facade.

A Window Wall facade like the one seen in the 425 Market Street Building uses panels fitted between floor slabs, leaving slab edges visible, while a modular facade like the one seen in the 383 Madison Avenue Building employs prefabricated panels, often mixing solid surfaces with smaller windows.