30 Hudson Yards vs Central Park Tower

Comparing the 30 Hudson Yards and the Central Park Tower is interesting because they both stand in New York, NY, and were completed just one year apart, but they were designed by different architects.

This offers a unique glimpse at how rival designers approached projects in the same city during the same era.

The Central Park Tower is clearly the larger tower of the two, both in terms of height and number of floors. It rises to 1549ft (472m) with 98 floors above ground, while the 30 Hudson Yards reaches 1296ft (395m) with 73 floors above ground.

Of course, each project may have faced different briefs or regulatory constraints, which we don't really know about and could also explain the outcome.

Both the 30 Hudson Yards and the Central Park Tower were designed in line with the aesthetic conventions of the Contemporary style.

At the time, this style was at the height of its popularity. So both Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates and Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture followed what was in many ways expected of them, producing designs that fit comfortably within contemporary architectural norms, rather than breaking with convention.

The 30 Hudson Yards is primarily commercial, while the Central Park Tower is primarily residential.

The Central Park Tower offers 179 residential units.

The two towers rely on different structural systems, reflecting distinct engineering strategies.

The 30 Hudson Yards uses a Trussed Frame structural system, which uses diagonal bracing in addition to beams and columns for stability, while the Central Park Tower uses a Frame system, that relies on a regular grid of columns and beams to sustain its weight.

Yet, when it comes to their facade, they both employed the same solution, a Curtain Wall facade.

A curtain wall is a non-load-bearing facade hung from the structural frame. It is anchored to floor slabs and transfers only its own weight and wind loads, allowing for sleek, glassy exteriors.