140 Broadway vs 383 Madison Avenue Building

140 Broadway
383 Madison Avenue Building

Comparing the 140 Broadway and the 383 Madison Avenue Building is particularly interesting because they share the same skyline in New York, NY, and were both designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. However, they were completed more than 34 years apart.

This offers a unique perspective on how the architect's style and the city's architecture evolved over time.

Height
210m
Floors
52

Height & Size

Height
230m
Floors
47

These two towers present an interesting contrast in their proportions. The 383 Madison Avenue Building rises higher at 755ft (230m), while the 140 Broadway reaches 689ft (210m). However, the 140 Broadway accommodates more floors with 52 levels above ground, compared to 47 floors in the 383 Madison Avenue Building.

This suggests different approaches to interior space design. The 383 Madison Avenue Building has an average floor-to-floor height of approximately 4.9m, while the 140 Broadway has more compact floors averaging around 4m each. The taller building's more generous floor heights might indicate grander interior spaces, higher ceilings, or different programmatic requirements.

These different proportions likely reflect the specific needs each building was designed to serve, whether driven by zoning regulations, client requirements, or the intended use of the spaces within. The contrast shows how architects can achieve different spatial experiences even when working with similar overall building scales.

Style
International Style

Architectural Style

Style
Contemporary

The 140 Broadway was designed in the International Style style, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building reflects the principles of Contemporary.

At the time of their completion, both styles were well established. This makes the comparison especially interesting, because both buildings represent a dominant aesthetic at a particular point in time.

Built 34 years apart (1967 vs 2001), these two buildings are a perfect example of how different architectural styles have shaped the architectural landscape of our cities over time.

Main use
Commercial

Uses

Main use
Commercial

Both the 140 Broadway and the 383 Madison Avenue Building were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.

Structure
Frame
Facade
Curtain Wall

Structure & Facade

Structure
Frame
Facade
Modular

Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.

A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.

However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The 140 Broadway uses a Curtain Wall facade, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building uses a Modular facade.

A Curtain Wall facade like the one seen in the 140 Broadway uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure, while a modular facade like the one seen in the 383 Madison Avenue Building employs prefabricated panels, often mixing solid surfaces with smaller windows.

140 Broadway 383 Madison Avenue Building
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill Architect Skidmore, Owings & Merrill
1964 Construction Started 1999
1967 Year Completed 2001
International Style Architectural Style Contemporary
Commercial Current Use Commercial
52 Floors Above Ground 47
210 m Height (m) 230 m
116,129 m² Usable Area (m²) 86,890 m²
24 Number of Elevators 30
Frame Structure Type Frame
Steel Vertical Structure Material Steel
Concrete Horizontal Structure Material Poured Concrete Over Metal Decking
No Facade Structural? No
Aluminum, Glass Main Facade Material Granite, Glass
Diesel Construction Company Main Contractor Turner Construction Company
Erwin S. Wolfson Developer Gerald D Hines Interests
Jaros, Baum & Bolles MEP Engineer Jaros Baum & Bolles
James Ruderman Structural Engineer WSP Cantor Seinuk
NY State NY
New York City New York
140 Broadway Address 383 Madison Avenue