140 Broadway vs 383 Madison Avenue Building


Comparing the 140 Broadway and the 383 Madison Avenue Building is particularly interesting because they share the same skyline in New York, NY, and were both designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill. However, they were completed more than 34 years apart.
This offers a unique perspective on how the architect's style and the city's architecture evolved over time.
Height & Size
These two towers present an interesting contrast in their proportions. The 383 Madison Avenue Building rises higher at 755ft (230m), while the 140 Broadway reaches 689ft (210m). However, the 140 Broadway accommodates more floors with 52 levels above ground, compared to 47 floors in the 383 Madison Avenue Building.
This suggests different approaches to interior space design. The 383 Madison Avenue Building has an average floor-to-floor height of approximately 4.9m, while the 140 Broadway has more compact floors averaging around 4m each. The taller building's more generous floor heights might indicate grander interior spaces, higher ceilings, or different programmatic requirements.
These different proportions likely reflect the specific needs each building was designed to serve, whether driven by zoning regulations, client requirements, or the intended use of the spaces within. The contrast shows how architects can achieve different spatial experiences even when working with similar overall building scales.
Architectural Style
The 140 Broadway was designed in the International Style style, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building reflects the principles of Contemporary.
At the time of their completion, both styles were well established. This makes the comparison especially interesting, because both buildings represent a dominant aesthetic at a particular point in time.Built 34 years apart (1967 vs 2001), these two buildings are a perfect example of how different architectural styles have shaped the architectural landscape of our cities over time.
Uses
Both the 140 Broadway and the 383 Madison Avenue Building were designed to serve as commercial towers, and that has remained their main use since their completion, serving similar roles in the urban fabric.
Structure & Facade
Both towers share the same structural solution, a Frame system.
A frame structure uses a grid of columns and beams to carry the building's loads. This frees the walls from structural duties, allowing for flexible floor plans and larger windows.
However, when it comes to the facade, both buildings use different approaches. The 140 Broadway uses a Curtain Wall facade, while the 383 Madison Avenue Building uses a Modular facade.
A Curtain Wall facade like the one seen in the 140 Broadway uses a lightweight glass curtain wall hung from the structure, while a modular facade like the one seen in the 383 Madison Avenue Building employs prefabricated panels, often mixing solid surfaces with smaller windows.
140 Broadway | 383 Madison Avenue Building | |
---|---|---|
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | Architect | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill |
1964 | Construction Started | 1999 |
1967 | Year Completed | 2001 |
International Style | Architectural Style | Contemporary |
Commercial | Current Use | Commercial |
52 | Floors Above Ground | 47 |
210 m | Height (m) | 230 m |
116,129 m² | Usable Area (m²) | 86,890 m² |
24 | Number of Elevators | 30 |
Frame | Structure Type | Frame |
Steel | Vertical Structure Material | Steel |
Concrete | Horizontal Structure Material | Poured Concrete Over Metal Decking |
No | Facade Structural? | No |
Aluminum, Glass | Main Facade Material | Granite, Glass |
Diesel Construction Company | Main Contractor | Turner Construction Company |
Erwin S. Wolfson | Developer | Gerald D Hines Interests |
Jaros, Baum & Bolles | MEP Engineer | Jaros Baum & Bolles |
James Ruderman | Structural Engineer | WSP Cantor Seinuk |
NY | State | NY |
New York | City | New York |
140 Broadway | Address | 383 Madison Avenue |